SB PROP @ ARL $ARLP024
ARLP024 Propagation de K7RA
QST de W1AW
Propagation Forecast Bulletin 24 ARLP024
From Tad Cook, K7RA
Seattle, WA June 15, 2012
To all radio amateurs
SB PROP ARL ARLP024
ARLP024 Propagation de K7RA
Solar activity was lower this week, although for the past few days sunspot numbers and solar flux were rising.
Average daily sunspot numbers declined over 14.3 points to 116.1, and average daily solar flux was off by 14.5 points to 115.9. There were five new sunspot groups this week, two each on June 9-10, and one more on June 13.
The latest prediction has solar flux at 150 on June 15-16, 145 on June 17-18, 140 on June 19-20, 130 and 120 on June 21-22, 110 on June 23-26, 105 on June 27-28, followed by a climb back to 120 on July 1-12.
Predicted planetary A index is 5 on June 15-16, 18 on June 17, 8 on June 18, and 5 on June 19-25. The next peak of geomagnetic activity is predicted for June 30 to July 4 with planetary A index at 8, 15, 12, 10 and 8. Following that is a similar peak on July 15-17 of 15, 12 and 8. Looking further out, planetary A index of 8, 15 and 12 is predicted for July 27-29.
The geomagnetic forecast from OK1MGW has quiet to unsettled conditions June 15-17, quiet to active June 18, active June 19-20, quiet to unsettled June 21, mostly quiet June 22-23, quiet to unsettled June 24-29, quiet to active June 30, and active conditions July 1-3.
The most active days over the past week were June 11-12, when the planetary A index was 14 and 13. The high latitude college A index was 22 and 8 on those days, but the mid-latitude A index numbers from Fredericksburg, Virginia were only 11 and 10.
heterodynes (AM was king). During Cycle 19, working the Tucson local 10 meter 'short skip' net, there were a couple of early evenings when stations across town in Tucson, AZ, were working short skip AND long path propagation simultaneously. That was a strange echo sounding mess. Turning our beams towards a short skip contact and 180 degrees away confirmed the phenomenon. I think we were probably on the so-called Grey Line."
Yes, in the days before SSB phone, a pile of AM signals could sound quite messy. By the way, 1948 was the year W7LTQ turned 16 years old. You can have a look at Cycles 18 and 19 and many others on the WM7D Historical Solar Charts at http://wm7d.net/hamradio/solar/historical.shtml. Cycles 18 and 19 are the fifth and sixth cycle peaks from the left side of the page in the chart of "Monthly Sunspot Numbers 1900 to 1999."
Regarding the link in last week's Propagation Forecast Bulletin to the researcher who believes modern sunspot numbers are inflated, Ken Grimm, K4XL of Amherst, Virginia wrote, "Regardless of what Prof. Svalgaard's charts and tables show, those of us who lived through the late 50s and enjoyed the benefits of something that he thinks
didn't happen, know what we experienced. Nothing since has come even close to the conditions on the HF bands during those wonderful days. Fifty watts of AM on 10 meters was enough to work the world with honest 5x9 sigs! Twenty meters was open 24 hours a day and DX was commonplace, etc. Nothing can convince me that the late 50s
An interesting article in the popular press appeared this week, suggesting that long term prediction of solar cycles is impossible. Read it at, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120612/jsp/frontpage/story_15600043.jsp.
Also note toward the end of the article that the student, Bidya Binay Karak, authored a paper explaining why sunspots disappeared for a time in 2008-2010. When I look at his curriculum vitae I see a paper about the Maunder Minimum, but not about the more recent quiet Sun. You can check Karak's CV at http://www.physics.iisc.ernet.in/~bidya_karak/.
Don't miss Carl Luetzelschwab's interesting article in the current (July 2012) issue of QST, "Our Recent Solar Minimum and Sunspot Cycle 24 Progress." You'll find it on page 33.
Phil Platt, of the Bad Astronomy blog has a link to a video of an active sunspot, complete with dramatic music at,
Also check http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/06/14/12227124-incoming-solar-storms-on-the-way
for a piece on upcoming solar storms.
On June 12, Jeff Hartley, N8II of Shepherdstown, West Virginia reported, "12 meters has been open to unexpected areas on F2 and combination Es/F2 paths recently. On the June 9 at 2317 I worked OM3EY with a S9 CW signal followed by HL2WP S7 at 2321Z. CQs towards Europe and Asia didn't result in any other contacts. 12 meter activity is pretty low.
"15 meters has been open all night to the west/NW for EU stations quite often lately. It was 0041Z (0341 in Latvia) when Alex YL3GAX answered my CQ, he was S7. Also worked around the same time were VK5BC on 10 meter SSB, FO8WBB on 12 CW, CT2HTM on 12 SSB, and TA, JA, DO1, and E70T on 15 SSB. Still the same evening June 10 UTC in the 0200Z hour on 15, ZL3TE, SU9VB, UR8GZ, EM2012MH, RZ0AF, and ZL4PW were logged on CW and UA9MA, OE6MDF, SV9ANK, and VK3HF on 15 SSB.
"Nothing much was happening above 15 meters towards EU on June 10 around 2000Z, but by 2052Z MD0CCE was logged 599 on 12 meter CW followed by IZ2BHP and G0GKH on 10 CW. Then CQs on 10 SSB resulted in a run of about 20 EU stations from 2112-2126Z the most distant being SV2FLM and 9A6JOY. Many Italians and British were logged along with GM, GW, EI, and F. This was a good Es opening with typical spotty coverage on the EU end. Quite a few stations were running 100W or less to verticals or low dipoles; they were typically S5 or less but Q5 with bigger stations mostly S7.
"On June 11 EA7JZ was worked peaking 59 on 10 meter SSB at 2225Z, no other EU heard or worked. He reported just making 3 LP QSOs with VK."
James French, W8ISS of Lincoln Park, Michigan wrote to ask if there were any reports of unusual propagation during the recent transit of Venus event. I did not receive any, nor did I expect them. But James got a great response when he set up a public viewing of the recent transit. He wrote, "had great viewing of the transit here in Lincoln Park (EN82jg). Helped out at the high school's observatory with the local astronomy club. Had about 400 turn out as it happened which was better than I really expected with no publicity that we were doing it other than a sign out at the road."
Steve Pulley of Stoughton, Wisconsin sent in an SWL report after copying last week's bulletin from W1AW using BPSK31 over a Radio Shack DX-392 general coverage shortwave receiver. Looks like perfect copy, using fldigi, which he read about in an ARRL License Manual. He was excited, waiting for his ham license in the mail. I see that on the same day he wrote, he was issued KC9WDH.
Don't know when we last had a look at this, but note the OVATION Auroral Forecast at http://helios.swpc.noaa.gov/ovation/. They display a handy red line indicating the furthest south points where aurora might be visible after dark.
If you would like to make a comment or have a tip for our readers, email the author at, firstname.lastname@example.org.
For more information concerning radio propagation, see the ARRL Technical Information Service web page at
http://arrl.org/propagation-of-rf-signals. For an explanation of the numbers used in this bulletin, see
http://arrl.org/the-sun-the-earth-the-ionosphere. An archive of past propagation bulletins is at
http://arrl.org/w1aw-bulletins-archive-propagation. Find more good information and tutorials on propagation at
Monthly propagation charts between four USA regions and twelve overseas locations are at http://arrl.org/propagation.
Instructions for starting or ending email distribution of ARRL bulletins are at http://arrl.org/bulletins.
Sunspot numbers for June 7 through 13 were 98, 90, 107, 127, 114, 132, and 145, with a mean of 116.1. 10.7 cm flux was 128.2, 124.2, 128.3, 128.3, 133.9, 141.3 and 142.8, with a mean of 115.9. Estimated planetary A indices were 8, 8, 8, 6, 14, 13, and 6, with a mean of 9. Estimated mid-latitude A indices were 8, 9, 9, 6, 11, 10, and 7, with a mean of 8.6.